Results of Occupy Central Hong Kong Final Deliberation Day: Here are the Three Election Proposals on the Ballot

By Mitchell Blatt | Uncategorized

May 06

Today, May 6, 2014, Occupy Central held its final deliberation day to select the proposals they will put on the ballot for the referendum they are holding on June 22 on establishing universal suffrage in Hong Kong.

Occupy Central is campaigning for universal suffrage for the 2017 chief executive election. The election in the past has been decided by a 2,000 person election committee. The 2017 election is expected to involve universal suffrage, but Occupy Central is concerned that the voting process will be fixed to favor the pro-Beijing candidate, so they decided to propose nomination and election procedures that adhere to international standards. If their proposal isn’t adopted, they plan to block the streets of downtown Hong Kong in protest.

Today, they deliberated over 15 proposals and 2,594 of their members voted. On June 22, they will include the three winning proposals in a referendum they are hosting that will be open to Hong Kong residents, and then they will demand the government adopt the winning proposal.

1948022_439164642887401_6377455685981186139_n

The three proposals that will be on the ballot are those of the student activist groups Scholarism and Federation of Students; the political party People Power; and the Alliance for True Democracy.

The proposals are similar on some key points: All three proposals include a pathway for civil nominations coming with the threshold set at 1% of registered voters for each proposal. All also include pathways for candidates to be nominated by nomination committee. In the past, the nominations have been made by the election committee, the same committee that votes for the chief executive, but the Students proposal and the People Power proposal seek to change the nomination committee to encompass only elected politicians. The Alliance For True Democracy proposal would keep the same nomination committee in place but would also include nomination by popular political parties. All proposals would include a two-round run-off system for the general election with a 50% threshold for victory.

To read about the proposals in detail, view them in PDF form here:
Students
People Power
Alliance for True Democracy

UPDATE: Many Hong Kong people, including pan-democrats, are criticizing the poll for having three options all with civic nominations. I wrote about the controversy at ChinaHush. The critics say the vote is undemocratic in that it denies anyone much of a choice.
















Like this article? Subscribe to receive articles and updates by email!





















About the Author

Mitchell Blatt is a travel writer, editor, and columnist based in China. He is an author of two guidebooks, Panda Guides Hong Kong and Panda Guides China. He has been published in National Interest.org, The Korea Times, Roads & Kingdoms, Vagabond Journey, The Hill.com, City Weekend, and The World of Chinese, among other outlets. See examples of his published articles.

[…] standards. The other question is about which proposal Occupy Central should endorse. The three proposals all call for civil nominations. Some moderate pan-democrats think the process has disenfranchised […]

[…] had publicly expected when the movement was facing some negative press coverage in the weeks after their deliberation day. After the vote, an estimated 500,000 people* marched in the annual June 1 […]

[…] of Occupy Central, has consistently cited 10,000 people as Occupy Central’s goal. At the final deliberation day, for which voting was only open to participants who had pledged to take part in Occupy Central, […]

Comments are closed

Follow Mitch on SNS
Mitchell Blatt is an intrepid travel writer, and an author of two top China guidebooks, who brings his readers deep into the cultures of the places he explores. Subscribe now to get real stories of real people in real places around the world delivered right to your inbox.